« Preaching To The Choir | Main | Joe Rogan Wins »
February 2, 2007
Daniel Negreanu, Charismatic vs. Annoying.
I found this cool site called convinceme.net which is all about debate. Pretty neat idea. Argue over stuff publicly and people vote on it.
Maybe I'll throw up some poker related ones. What are some good ideas? Here are a few I thought up:
Phil Hellmuth, best player ever?
Liz Lieu, hot vs. just another anorexic Asian chick with a boob job. (Seriously, you can't throw a stick in Los Angeles without hitting a carbon copy of her.)
Bill Frist, asshat vs. serial cat killing asshat?
Matt Maroon, great poker blogger, vs. the greatest poker blogger.
Any others?
Posted by themaroon at February 2, 2007 4:54 AM
Comments
Matt that link takes me to lunarpages... sounds like a good idea though.
Posted by: Paul at February 2, 2007 8:36 AM
Convinceme.net - Cool site, or just another place that can't pay it's hosting fees?
Posted by: Adam at February 2, 2007 8:52 AM
1) Yeah, not so much.
2) Who cares, Asian chicks with boob jobs are ALL hot!
3) cereal cat killing asshat (I hear he took a hit out on Tony the Tiger)
4) blogs are ghey
Posted by: Falstaff at February 2, 2007 11:41 AM
"Bill Frist, asshat vs. serial cat killing asshat?"
Why bother with this debate? Both sides win.
Posted by: Michael at February 2, 2007 2:36 PM
Brandi Hawbaker v. Mark Newhouse
Bill Frist or John Edwards: Who is the bigger asshat? (I'm divided on Frist -- angry at him for the antigambling legislation but he did support tax cuts; Edwards terrifies me.)
Other views:
Liz is not objectively hot but I'd hit it anyway;
extempore would win in a walk if he were still blogging poker, and "best poker blogger" is damning yourself with pretty faint praise. Shaniac is the only real competition.
I read shannonshorr.com just because of my prop bet. Are there any worse comments on any blog anywhere than his? Bonomo's has some good thoughts on it, but he only posts when he wins. Rather amusing.
Posted by: Howard Treesong at February 5, 2007 1:35 PM